FCC Licenses
Should CBS's license have been revoked for the Dan Rather affair?
All the news networks have been guilty of shady tactics to get news stories. I always hated the "unidentified sources" that use to be the standard line on ABC, NBC and CBS. That finally died when a judge left some reporters in jail for a long time. Either they refused to reveal their source or there never was a source to reveal.
Atheists, Progressive, Socialists, Liberals, Pacifists and Democrats are mean ugly aggressive people that like to use the law but not follow the law.
Atheists, Progressive, Socialists, Liberals, Pacifists and Democrats hate Fox News because Fox News presents the conservative view on issues.
I have never been able to tell if the Atheistic Liberal News and Entertainment Industry was the propaganda wing of the Democratic Party or the Democratic Party was the political wing of the Atheistic Liberal News and Entertainment Industry. And yes, Fox News does support the Republican Party.
The reality is that the word "news" should be changed to "views" and allow both liberals and conservatives to slug it out under the concept of "freedom of speech".
I do believe the FCC should establish a whistle blower fund to reward people that show obvious lying as occurred with Dan Rather.
---------------------------
Liberal Group Targets Fox Licenses with FCC
Tuesday, 01 May 2012 09:55 PM
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/fox-murdoch-licenses-crew/2012/05/01/id/437724
A liberal ethics watchdog, taking advantage of a highly critical British parliamentary committee's report on the phone hacking scandal involving Rupert Murdoch's News Corp, is urging federal regulators to revoke 27 broadcast licenses belonging to the company's Fox broadcasting company.
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Clinton Class Liars
Clinton Class Liars
What has happened to all the Clinton Class Liars of the Atheistic Liberal News Media? They use to be able to take a mole hill statement by Christians and Republicans and make a mountain out of it. They controlled both domestic and foreign policy by reporting only good news about Atheists and Democrats and only bad news by Christians and Republicans.
A favorite tool of the Clinton Class Liars was the "undisclosed source". When the courts struck down the "undisclosed source" concept, Dan Rather got caught fabricating the news, thus discrediting all the Clinton Class Liars.
The Woodward's, Ifill's, Warner's, Sawyer's, Couric's just are not Clinton Class Liars. Maybe it take a man to really lie like Clinton and Cronkite.
Obama is really suffering without the Clinton Class Liars, and with Fox News covering the things the Atheistic Liberal News Media was able to suppress in the past.
Even Clinton himself does not seem to be able to help Obama, but I believe the problem there is personalities.
What has happened to all the Clinton Class Liars of the Atheistic Liberal News Media? They use to be able to take a mole hill statement by Christians and Republicans and make a mountain out of it. They controlled both domestic and foreign policy by reporting only good news about Atheists and Democrats and only bad news by Christians and Republicans.
A favorite tool of the Clinton Class Liars was the "undisclosed source". When the courts struck down the "undisclosed source" concept, Dan Rather got caught fabricating the news, thus discrediting all the Clinton Class Liars.
The Woodward's, Ifill's, Warner's, Sawyer's, Couric's just are not Clinton Class Liars. Maybe it take a man to really lie like Clinton and Cronkite.
Obama is really suffering without the Clinton Class Liars, and with Fox News covering the things the Atheistic Liberal News Media was able to suppress in the past.
Even Clinton himself does not seem to be able to help Obama, but I believe the problem there is personalities.
Saturday, July 2, 2011
Atheistic Liberal News Media are Hypocrites
Atheistic Liberal News Media are Hypocrites
I support the removal of Gadiffi but the Atheistic Liberal News Media is are hypocrites for their failure to criticize Obama and the Democrats, at they were pleased to criticize Bush and the Republicans.
Moma's don't let you children sell their soul to Satan by being a part of the Atheistic Liberal News Media.
------------------------------
U.S. forces STILL flying hundreds of bombing raids over Libya as Obama says America is only playing a limited role
Last updated at 6:29 AM on 2nd July 2011
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2010505/Air-Force-Navy-flying-thousands-missions-Libya-Obama-says-U-S-playing-limited-role.html
U.S. forces are still flying hundreds of bombing raids over Libya even though the Obama administration claims that American armed forces are only playing a limited role in the conflict.
Since NATO's Operation Unified Protector took over from the American-led Operation Odyssey Dawn on 31 March, the U.S. has flown hundreds of strike missions, according to United States Africa Command (AFRICOM).
The White House originally claimed that U.S. planes were mostly providing intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance and played down the number of bombing raids.
However AFRICOM spokeswoman Nicole Dalrymple said: 'U.S. aircraft continue to fly support missions, as well as strike sorties under NATO tasking.
I support the removal of Gadiffi but the Atheistic Liberal News Media is are hypocrites for their failure to criticize Obama and the Democrats, at they were pleased to criticize Bush and the Republicans.
Moma's don't let you children sell their soul to Satan by being a part of the Atheistic Liberal News Media.
------------------------------
U.S. forces STILL flying hundreds of bombing raids over Libya as Obama says America is only playing a limited role
Last updated at 6:29 AM on 2nd July 2011
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2010505/Air-Force-Navy-flying-thousands-missions-Libya-Obama-says-U-S-playing-limited-role.html
U.S. forces are still flying hundreds of bombing raids over Libya even though the Obama administration claims that American armed forces are only playing a limited role in the conflict.
Since NATO's Operation Unified Protector took over from the American-led Operation Odyssey Dawn on 31 March, the U.S. has flown hundreds of strike missions, according to United States Africa Command (AFRICOM).
The White House originally claimed that U.S. planes were mostly providing intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance and played down the number of bombing raids.
However AFRICOM spokeswoman Nicole Dalrymple said: 'U.S. aircraft continue to fly support missions, as well as strike sorties under NATO tasking.
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Media Matters' war against Fox
Media Matters' war against Fox
America needs another McCarthy to investigate Media Matters and George Soros for un-American activities.
McCarthy investigated Communism, but now we need to investigate Atheism.
Atheism in American is just as destructive as Communism.
--------------------------------
Media Matters' war against Fox
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51949.html
By BEN SMITH | 3/26/11 7:23 AM EDT Updated: 3/27/11 5:06 PM EDT
The liberal group Media Matters has quietly transformed itself in preparation for what its founder, David Brock, described in an interview as an all-out campaign of "guerrilla warfare and sabotage" aimed at the Fox News Channel.
The group, launched as a more traditional media critic, has all but abandoned its monitoring of newspapers and other television networks and is narrowing its focus to Fox and a handful of conservative websites, which its leaders view as political organizations and the "nerve center" of the conservative movement. The shift reflects the centrality of the cable channel to the contemporary conservative movement, as well as the loathing it inspires among liberals — not least among the donors who fund Media Matters' staff of about 90, who are arrayed in neat rows in a giant war room above Massachusetts Avenue.
"The strategy that we had had toward Fox was basically a strategy of containment," said Brock, Media Matters' chairman and founder and a former conservative journalist, adding that the group's main aim had been to challenge the factual claims of the channel and to attempt to prevent them from reaching the mainstream media.
The new strategy, he said, is a "war on Fox."
In an interview and a 2010 planning memo shared with POLITICO, Brock listed the fronts on which Media Matters — which he said is operating on a $10 million-plus annual budget — is working to chip away at Fox and its parent company, News Corp. They include its bread-and-butter distribution of embarrassing clips and attempts to rebut Fox points, as well as a series of under-the-radar tactics.
Media Matters, Brock said, is assembling opposition research files not only on Fox's top executives but on a series of midlevel officials. It has hired an activist who has led a successful campaign to press advertisers to avoid Glenn Beck's show. The group is assembling a legal team to help people who have clashed with Fox to file lawsuits for defamation, invasion of privacy or other causes. And it has hired two experienced reporters, Joe Strupp and Alexander Zaitchik, to dig into Fox's operation to help assemble a book on the network, due out in 2012 from Vintage/Anchor. (In the interest of full disclosure, Media Matters last month also issued a report criticizing "Fox and Friends" co-host Steve Doocy's criticism of this reporter's blog.)
Brock said Media Matters also plans to run a broad campaign against Fox's parent company, News Corp., an effort which most likely will involve opening a United Kingdom arm in London to attack the company's interests there. The group hired an executive from MoveOn.org to work on developing campaigns among News Corp. shareholders and also is looking for ways to turn regulators in the U.S., U.K., and elsewhere against the network.
The group will "focus on [News Corp. CEO Rupert] Murdoch and trying to disrupt his commercial interests — whether that be here or looking at what's going on in London right now," Brock said, referring to News Corp.'s — apparently successful — move to take a majority stake in the satellite broadcaster BSkyB.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51949.html#ixzz1HzfzirSu
America needs another McCarthy to investigate Media Matters and George Soros for un-American activities.
McCarthy investigated Communism, but now we need to investigate Atheism.
Atheism in American is just as destructive as Communism.
--------------------------------
Media Matters' war against Fox
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51949.html
By BEN SMITH | 3/26/11 7:23 AM EDT Updated: 3/27/11 5:06 PM EDT
The liberal group Media Matters has quietly transformed itself in preparation for what its founder, David Brock, described in an interview as an all-out campaign of "guerrilla warfare and sabotage" aimed at the Fox News Channel.
The group, launched as a more traditional media critic, has all but abandoned its monitoring of newspapers and other television networks and is narrowing its focus to Fox and a handful of conservative websites, which its leaders view as political organizations and the "nerve center" of the conservative movement. The shift reflects the centrality of the cable channel to the contemporary conservative movement, as well as the loathing it inspires among liberals — not least among the donors who fund Media Matters' staff of about 90, who are arrayed in neat rows in a giant war room above Massachusetts Avenue.
"The strategy that we had had toward Fox was basically a strategy of containment," said Brock, Media Matters' chairman and founder and a former conservative journalist, adding that the group's main aim had been to challenge the factual claims of the channel and to attempt to prevent them from reaching the mainstream media.
The new strategy, he said, is a "war on Fox."
In an interview and a 2010 planning memo shared with POLITICO, Brock listed the fronts on which Media Matters — which he said is operating on a $10 million-plus annual budget — is working to chip away at Fox and its parent company, News Corp. They include its bread-and-butter distribution of embarrassing clips and attempts to rebut Fox points, as well as a series of under-the-radar tactics.
Media Matters, Brock said, is assembling opposition research files not only on Fox's top executives but on a series of midlevel officials. It has hired an activist who has led a successful campaign to press advertisers to avoid Glenn Beck's show. The group is assembling a legal team to help people who have clashed with Fox to file lawsuits for defamation, invasion of privacy or other causes. And it has hired two experienced reporters, Joe Strupp and Alexander Zaitchik, to dig into Fox's operation to help assemble a book on the network, due out in 2012 from Vintage/Anchor. (In the interest of full disclosure, Media Matters last month also issued a report criticizing "Fox and Friends" co-host Steve Doocy's criticism of this reporter's blog.)
Brock said Media Matters also plans to run a broad campaign against Fox's parent company, News Corp., an effort which most likely will involve opening a United Kingdom arm in London to attack the company's interests there. The group hired an executive from MoveOn.org to work on developing campaigns among News Corp. shareholders and also is looking for ways to turn regulators in the U.S., U.K., and elsewhere against the network.
The group will "focus on [News Corp. CEO Rupert] Murdoch and trying to disrupt his commercial interests — whether that be here or looking at what's going on in London right now," Brock said, referring to News Corp.'s — apparently successful — move to take a majority stake in the satellite broadcaster BSkyB.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51949.html#ixzz1HzfzirSu
Saturday, March 19, 2011
Example of Yellow Journalism
Example of Yellow Journalism
The following is an example of Yellow Journalism. The headline implies great danger, but he story says there is no danger. The person that made up the headline is an yellow jounalist.
--------------------------------------------------
Tokyo water sample shows radioactive iodine: government
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/19/us-japan-water-idUSTRE72I29J20110319
TOKYO | Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:57am EDT
TOKYO (Reuters) - A sample of tap water from the Japanese capital shows a tiny level of radioactive iodine after an earthquake and tsunami damaged a nuclear power plant 240 km (150 miles) north of Tokyo, the government said on Saturday.
The sample contained 1.5 becquerals per kg of iodine 131, well below the tolerable limit for food and drink of 300 becquerals per kg, the government added.
Jiji news agency said the presence of radioactive iodine in Tokyo tap water was rare.
The following is an example of Yellow Journalism. The headline implies great danger, but he story says there is no danger. The person that made up the headline is an yellow jounalist.
--------------------------------------------------
Tokyo water sample shows radioactive iodine: government
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/19/us-japan-water-idUSTRE72I29J20110319
TOKYO | Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:57am EDT
TOKYO (Reuters) - A sample of tap water from the Japanese capital shows a tiny level of radioactive iodine after an earthquake and tsunami damaged a nuclear power plant 240 km (150 miles) north of Tokyo, the government said on Saturday.
The sample contained 1.5 becquerals per kg of iodine 131, well below the tolerable limit for food and drink of 300 becquerals per kg, the government added.
Jiji news agency said the presence of radioactive iodine in Tokyo tap water was rare.
Fukushima Power Plant Yellow Journalism
Fukushima Power Plant Yellow Journalism
Shepard Smith says there is an apocalypse situation at the Fukushima Power Plant, but the following report by Tokyo Electric is totally different. Someone is lying.
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/11031906-e.html
No New Developments since 9:00pm, 19th March
Unit Status
1 • Reactor cold shutdown, stable water level, offsite power is
available.
• No cooling water is leaked to the reactor containment vessel.
• Maintain average water temperature at 100°C in the pressure
restraint.
2 • Reactor cold shutdown, stable water level, offsite power is
available.
• No cooling water is leaked to the reactor containment vessel.
• Maintain average water temperature at 100°C in the pressure
restraint.
3 • Reactor cold shutdown, stable water level, offsite power is
available.
• No cooling water is leaked to the reactor containment vessel.
• Maintain average water temperature at 100°C in the pressure
restraint.
4 • Reactor cold shutdown, stable water level, offsite power is
available.
• No cooling water is leaked to the reactor containment vessel.
• Maintain average water temperature at 100°C in the pressure
restraint.
I believe the problem is yellow journalism by an irresponsible headline grabbing news media that is being fed false and misleading information by anti nuclear environmentalists that are speculating to the point of lying. I believe some of the statements made by anti nuclear environmentalists are intentional lies.
I believe a part of the problem is the news media is mostly anti nuclear so they are looking for anti nuclear lies to use for headline grabbing. The news media was into global warming, which indicates to me they are biased toward environmentalist positions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism
Yellow journalism or the yellow press is a type of journalism that presents little or no legitimate well-researched news and instead uses eye-catching headlines to sell more newspapers. Techniques may include exaggerations of news events, scandal-mongering, or sensationalism. By extension "Yellow Journalism" is used today as a pejorative to decry any journalism that treats news in an unprofessional or unethical fashion.
Campbell (2001) defines Yellow Press newspapers as having daily multi-column front-page headlines covering a variety of topics, such as sports and scandal, using bold layouts (with large illustrations and perhaps color), heavy reliance on unnamed sources, and unabashed self-promotion. The term was extensively used to describe certain major New York City newspapers about 1900 as they battled for circulation.
Frank Luther Mott (1941) defines yellow journalism in terms of five characteristics:[1]
1. scare headlines in huge print, often of minor news
2. lavish use of pictures, or imaginary drawings
3. use of faked interviews, misleading headlines, pseudo-science, and a parade of false learning from so-called experts
4. emphasis on full-color Sunday supplements, usually with comic strips (which is now normal in the U.S.)
5. dramatic sympathy with the "underdog" against the system.
Someone is lying and if there is no apocalypse at the Fukushima Power Plant I expect Shepard Smith to resign. I certainly will never consider an words out of Shepard Smiths mouth to ever to be the truth.
Freedom of the press requires the press act responsibly.
Shepard Smith says there is an apocalypse situation at the Fukushima Power Plant, but the following report by Tokyo Electric is totally different. Someone is lying.
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/11031906-e.html
No New Developments since 9:00pm, 19th March
Unit Status
1 • Reactor cold shutdown, stable water level, offsite power is
available.
• No cooling water is leaked to the reactor containment vessel.
• Maintain average water temperature at 100°C in the pressure
restraint.
2 • Reactor cold shutdown, stable water level, offsite power is
available.
• No cooling water is leaked to the reactor containment vessel.
• Maintain average water temperature at 100°C in the pressure
restraint.
3 • Reactor cold shutdown, stable water level, offsite power is
available.
• No cooling water is leaked to the reactor containment vessel.
• Maintain average water temperature at 100°C in the pressure
restraint.
4 • Reactor cold shutdown, stable water level, offsite power is
available.
• No cooling water is leaked to the reactor containment vessel.
• Maintain average water temperature at 100°C in the pressure
restraint.
I believe the problem is yellow journalism by an irresponsible headline grabbing news media that is being fed false and misleading information by anti nuclear environmentalists that are speculating to the point of lying. I believe some of the statements made by anti nuclear environmentalists are intentional lies.
I believe a part of the problem is the news media is mostly anti nuclear so they are looking for anti nuclear lies to use for headline grabbing. The news media was into global warming, which indicates to me they are biased toward environmentalist positions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism
Yellow journalism or the yellow press is a type of journalism that presents little or no legitimate well-researched news and instead uses eye-catching headlines to sell more newspapers. Techniques may include exaggerations of news events, scandal-mongering, or sensationalism. By extension "Yellow Journalism" is used today as a pejorative to decry any journalism that treats news in an unprofessional or unethical fashion.
Campbell (2001) defines Yellow Press newspapers as having daily multi-column front-page headlines covering a variety of topics, such as sports and scandal, using bold layouts (with large illustrations and perhaps color), heavy reliance on unnamed sources, and unabashed self-promotion. The term was extensively used to describe certain major New York City newspapers about 1900 as they battled for circulation.
Frank Luther Mott (1941) defines yellow journalism in terms of five characteristics:[1]
1. scare headlines in huge print, often of minor news
2. lavish use of pictures, or imaginary drawings
3. use of faked interviews, misleading headlines, pseudo-science, and a parade of false learning from so-called experts
4. emphasis on full-color Sunday supplements, usually with comic strips (which is now normal in the U.S.)
5. dramatic sympathy with the "underdog" against the system.
Someone is lying and if there is no apocalypse at the Fukushima Power Plant I expect Shepard Smith to resign. I certainly will never consider an words out of Shepard Smiths mouth to ever to be the truth.
Freedom of the press requires the press act responsibly.
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Atheistic Liberal News Media
Atheistic Liberal News Media
For many years, I have stated my concern about the Atheistic Liberal News and Entertainment Industry that I believe has perverted America from being a Christian Nation.
http://narj-clirus.blogspot.com/
It is good to see other people agree (see comments to news story) with my position on the Atheistic Liberal News Media.
Some would say that it is unfair to add, "Atheistic", but I believe there is a symbiotic relation between liberalism and Atheism.
--------------------------
Evening News Ratings: 2009-2010 Season
By Chris Ariens on Sep 21, 2010 11:45 AM
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/evening_news_ratings/evening_news_ratings_20092010_season__174003.asp
The ratings are in the for just-completed 2009-2010 network evening news season. And when compared to 2008-2009 season, "NBC Nightly News" ABC's "World News" and the "CBS Evening News" have lost a combined 739,000 Total Viewers and a combined 338,000 A25-54 viewers.
"Nightly News with Brian Williams," which finishes at #1 for the 14th season in a row, lost the least: -138K Total Viewers (8.698M in 08-09 v. 8.560M in 09-10), while Katie Couric's CBS program, lost the most: -343K (6.053M in 08-09 v 5.710M in 09-10). "World News" which saw Charles Gibson anchor the first few months of the season, and Diane Sawyer picking up in December, lost the most younger viewers: -221K (2.351M in 08-09 v. 2.130 in 09-10).
BiggEd - What do you expect? They shoved an ill qualified presidential candidate, Barak Obama down our throat, "for our own good". Never asking the hard questions, even once. Just fawning over him and his platitudes, with "chills running down their legs".
Meanwhile they beat the snot out of a more qualified female conservative, Governor Palin, taking cheap shots and with careful editing they made her look silly.
The American public is not stupid, it's time to pay the piper Katie, Charlie, Chris and Keith. We're mad as hell and we ain't gonna take it anymore!
94 people liked this.
Jamalagrin - The three, so called main news media, is nothing but a mouth piece for the Obama Administration and liberalism. The American people by the droves are turning to fair and balanced news from Fox News, The Internet, and Talk Radio.
Very soon, the only ones watching these loser news stations will be hard core socialists and these loser network people themselves.
80 people liked this.
amplover1 -Who cares. Thinking people do not watch network news. These networks' teleprompter readers simply regurgitate the talking points supporting the dictatorship. Most people watch their local news (biased against the citizens as it often is) and this leads into these leftist Marxist biased broadcasts. If it wasn't for local news, nobody would watch it. When they bring back journalists, and stop cheerleading the destruction of our nation, perhaps their fortunes will improve. Frankly, the success of CNN and MSNBC on cable should also tell them something. Williams, Sawyer, Couric - - these are not journalists. They are Democrat party propaganda experts.
37 people liked this.
John Steinbeck -
The network news work hand in hand with the democrat/socialist party.
Everything they do or report is driven by that fact.
If it helps democrats report it loudly. If it helps GOP bury it. If it hurts democrats bury it, if it hurts GOP scream it loudly.
Anyone with a brain knows this is true and the networks trying to deny this truth just makes them more and more irrelevant.
For years the networks tried to hide this fact but during the last decade and certainly during the election of Obama, the networks came completely out of the closet and showed their collusion with the cheer-leading they did for Obama.
When the final nail is driven into the coffin of the liberal biased media and they're buried 6 feet under, I will dance on their grave.
114 people liked this.
alvinjh - The news networks never believed that people were offended by their constant left wing preaching. They never even TRIED to be fair in their coverage. I stopped watching them about 4 years ago. I don't miss them. And yes, I watch a lot of Fox News, and I read the International press online. Couric in particular irritated me with her disrespectful and haughty treatment of President Bush. We are a polarized people now. We have chosen sides. Too bad the network executives thought their job was to lead us to a particular destination rather than provide information and let us decide where we wanted to go ourselves. Well, that was their choice.
90 people liked this.
For many years, I have stated my concern about the Atheistic Liberal News and Entertainment Industry that I believe has perverted America from being a Christian Nation.
http://narj-clirus.blogspot.com/
It is good to see other people agree (see comments to news story) with my position on the Atheistic Liberal News Media.
Some would say that it is unfair to add, "Atheistic", but I believe there is a symbiotic relation between liberalism and Atheism.
--------------------------
Evening News Ratings: 2009-2010 Season
By Chris Ariens on Sep 21, 2010 11:45 AM
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/evening_news_ratings/evening_news_ratings_20092010_season__174003.asp
The ratings are in the for just-completed 2009-2010 network evening news season. And when compared to 2008-2009 season, "NBC Nightly News" ABC's "World News" and the "CBS Evening News" have lost a combined 739,000 Total Viewers and a combined 338,000 A25-54 viewers.
"Nightly News with Brian Williams," which finishes at #1 for the 14th season in a row, lost the least: -138K Total Viewers (8.698M in 08-09 v. 8.560M in 09-10), while Katie Couric's CBS program, lost the most: -343K (6.053M in 08-09 v 5.710M in 09-10). "World News" which saw Charles Gibson anchor the first few months of the season, and Diane Sawyer picking up in December, lost the most younger viewers: -221K (2.351M in 08-09 v. 2.130 in 09-10).
BiggEd - What do you expect? They shoved an ill qualified presidential candidate, Barak Obama down our throat, "for our own good". Never asking the hard questions, even once. Just fawning over him and his platitudes, with "chills running down their legs".
Meanwhile they beat the snot out of a more qualified female conservative, Governor Palin, taking cheap shots and with careful editing they made her look silly.
The American public is not stupid, it's time to pay the piper Katie, Charlie, Chris and Keith. We're mad as hell and we ain't gonna take it anymore!
94 people liked this.
Jamalagrin - The three, so called main news media, is nothing but a mouth piece for the Obama Administration and liberalism. The American people by the droves are turning to fair and balanced news from Fox News, The Internet, and Talk Radio.
Very soon, the only ones watching these loser news stations will be hard core socialists and these loser network people themselves.
80 people liked this.
amplover1 -Who cares. Thinking people do not watch network news. These networks' teleprompter readers simply regurgitate the talking points supporting the dictatorship. Most people watch their local news (biased against the citizens as it often is) and this leads into these leftist Marxist biased broadcasts. If it wasn't for local news, nobody would watch it. When they bring back journalists, and stop cheerleading the destruction of our nation, perhaps their fortunes will improve. Frankly, the success of CNN and MSNBC on cable should also tell them something. Williams, Sawyer, Couric - - these are not journalists. They are Democrat party propaganda experts.
37 people liked this.
John Steinbeck -
The network news work hand in hand with the democrat/socialist party.
Everything they do or report is driven by that fact.
If it helps democrats report it loudly. If it helps GOP bury it. If it hurts democrats bury it, if it hurts GOP scream it loudly.
Anyone with a brain knows this is true and the networks trying to deny this truth just makes them more and more irrelevant.
For years the networks tried to hide this fact but during the last decade and certainly during the election of Obama, the networks came completely out of the closet and showed their collusion with the cheer-leading they did for Obama.
When the final nail is driven into the coffin of the liberal biased media and they're buried 6 feet under, I will dance on their grave.
114 people liked this.
alvinjh - The news networks never believed that people were offended by their constant left wing preaching. They never even TRIED to be fair in their coverage. I stopped watching them about 4 years ago. I don't miss them. And yes, I watch a lot of Fox News, and I read the International press online. Couric in particular irritated me with her disrespectful and haughty treatment of President Bush. We are a polarized people now. We have chosen sides. Too bad the network executives thought their job was to lead us to a particular destination rather than provide information and let us decide where we wanted to go ourselves. Well, that was their choice.
90 people liked this.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)